What I've Seen with Your Eyes

Eskil posted the video for his GDC presentations and they're abso-freakin-lutely amazing.

The gameplay of Love was interesting, but the video displaying the tools Eskil created are completely mind blowing. It's the stuff that actually gives you hope for the world again. The GDC tool video shows off several tools Eskil has released: Loq Ariou which allows you to create assets & models with the same ease as a pencil & scratch paper, Co On which provides scene mapping that's startlingly similar to how you might visualize things in your own mind, and Verse, a data transfer & protocol standard that allows such data to be shared instantaneously between applications.

Obviously Eskil had to create an intelligent set of tools to properly build Love within a decade, but I had no idea he had constructed such a cadre of tools that could be re-used by other developers. Not only does he speed content generation up and provide better interfaces - he goes one step further by breaking down human factor boundaries that plague every other asset generation tool to date. Just watch the video - especially the portion demonstrating shaders in Co On - and you'll see why I'm going completely nuts over these releases.

Eskil is giving back a huge amount to the community at large with these tools, and is likely opening the doors for many, many others to creatively express themselves in ways that were once prohibitively difficult. Love isn't just creating a fanbase... it's creating a legacy.

Love for the Indie Developers

It was interesting reading GameSetWatch's interview with Love's Eskil Steenberg. Was very cool to hear Eskil was good friends with the garage developers at Introversion. Interesting also to hear his opinions on procedurally generated content.

Eskil is developing Love entirely on his own, and using procedurally generated content to generate what he needs for something of such a vast scope was a necessity. Introversion is familiar with this same issue - you can see its effects in Darwinia.

Would be a nice thing to get back into.

Independent Horticulture

Another great invention by the creators of Penny Arcade: Greenhouse.

Steam has done a great job making independent and smaller titles much apparent to the populous, and since titles don't have to compete for shelf space a genre for every palate can be made readily available. And while CodeWeavers has done their best to allow Steam & Source titles to run on Linux & OS X, it can't be said that Steam is a cross-platform solution.

Not so with Greenhouse. It offers native support for OS X, Windows and Linux in tandem. And their inaugural title will be cross-platform. And if they continue to support independent and episodic titles, this could be a bigger competitor to Steam than GameTap.

Procedurally Generated Pinkslips

Penny Arcade's recent podcast featured a rant - no... more of a reckoning... versus Spore. I find Spore's idea of dynamically generated content interesting, mainly because of my bias towards one-man development teams and procedurally generated content. But Mike and Jerry don't want to see artists and writers out of a job... and the concept that zombie algorithms can build music or images is looked upon with disdain. To them games are an artistic outlet for modelers, musicians and authors. But to developers they can seem like a growing necessity that a garage studio simply can't bankroll.

Eskil Steenberg's Love is described by Rock, Paper, Shotgun as "...lavish impressionistic artwork brought to life... in motion it was suggestive of a smokey, dynamically lit version of Okami." Dynamic terrain deformation and procedurally generated assets allow Eskil to wrap some amazing gameplay into what looks like a surreal and compelling atmosphere.

Not only does this mean that players get to glimpse into chaos, they get to play with it. And anyone who names such an ambitious effort after "For The Love Of Game Development" inspires hope in a lot of indie developers.

My Wii Little Friend

Say hello to my Wii little friend! Happy Valentine's day to me...

It's safe to say my productivity is back down to zero. In fact, my indy development may well just be done now. I'm not sure. You may have noticed my attention has hovered more around video editing, DVR's and gaming itself rather than development. I'm not sure if I'm calling it quits or just taking a break.

We'll see. I've got a few rounds of golf to play now.

Blogroom Blitz

If you haven't noticed, I've taken upon myself to use this blog as a conduit for taking old articles and posts, espousing their ideas with my own, then regurgitating them for myself and all those regular readers, numbering too many to count. Mainly because I never learned how. Today, dear Rockford, is no different.

The Bad Game Designer, No Twinkie! database is online. I took a moment to read the article about how bad bottom-up game design is... something every new game developer should read. 99% of indy developers take an engine "concept" - physics, fluid dynamics, spatial sound, bump mapping, geometry shaders, whatevea... then they make that one property the "game". I do that. Repeatedly. Still am. Right now. At this moment.

Back in November, there was a round-the-world blogging event entitled "So You Want To Be An Indy Game Developer?" Crowd favorite Introversion was there, as well as our good friends at Gibbage. While the resonant theme was "don't hope to make enough money to eat whilst being an indy developer," there were some notable other nuggets to be had.

Cliffskis had some good, pragmatic advice such as maintaining a solid online presence. Content should be easily available, never move to a different URL and have stuff that is quick to download and install. Realize it will take years to be noticed, and you'll want to make sure that you leave an adequate trail to be found.

GameProducer.Net had some points that I've already discovered the hard way... if I had heard this advice earlier, it would have easily saved me nearly two years of work. Begin by making a game, not by learning how to make games. Knowing the technology is certainly part of the process, but if you stick with just the development process you won't progress much beyond writing demos and how-to's. Alongside that thought, don't re-engineer the wheel. So many fantastic engines, API's and SDK's are ready and waiting for developers... don't try to create a 3D engine on your own. Worst case, find an open source project (i.e. CrystalSpace) and help them out. Save time, grief, effort, bugs, etc. by using existing tools.

Reality From The Sidelines had an entry that could have well been ripped from the pages of this very blog. Not only is he extremely tardy in producing a title, but he moved from grandiose ideas of FPS' & believing casual games were too lowly to consider to finding casual games the best place to being experimenting with both design, production and gameplay. We both seem to realize like time is slipping away, and whatever we do, it needs to be now.

Zoombapup focused the entire post on making a single, but very striking point. I'm definitely not looking to make any cash with any titles I might release, but I won't turn down any accidental riches that land in my path. Zoomba illustrates how excruciatingly difficult any riches, incidental or not, are to glean from small-biz development. Although he uses the same concrete (as pudding) mathematics as my science teacher used to estimate the number of piano tuners in New York, the basic figures are sound. If you're wildly successful, you'd be lucky to have two years of effort translate into $100,000. More than likely, it would be -$100,000.

Never use Comic Sans.